Ireland is facing a rare financial conundrum: too much money. Finance Minister Jack Chambers recently revealed that the country expects a record-breaking €24 billion budget surplus for 2024. This extraordinary surplus is largely driven by a massive back tax payment from tech giant Apple and ballooning corporate tax receipts from U.S. multinationals.
Ireland’s favorable tax regime, which has long attracted major corporations, continues to defy global efforts to reform corporate tax practices. Despite the landmark global tax deal brokered by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2021, which was intended to curb profit shifting and eliminate low-tax havens, Ireland’s financial coffers remain robust.
Global Tax Reforms Fall Short
The OECD’s global tax reform aimed to reduce incentives for companies to declare profits in low-tax countries like Ireland. The two-pronged deal included the introduction of a digital tax and a 15% minimum corporate tax rate. In theory, these measures were designed to end the “race to the bottom” in global tax rates and force companies to pay taxes where revenue is generated. However, as Ireland’s booming tax revenues demonstrate, the reforms have had limited impact thus far.
The 2024 surplus stems in part from a European Union (EU) court ruling requiring Apple to pay Ireland €13 billion in back taxes. The Irish government had initially resisted this windfall, arguing that it was not entitled to the money. But even without Apple’s back payment, Ireland would still be running a budget surplus, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which expects the country’s budget balance to remain positive for years.
Low Corporate Tax Rate Drives Inflows
Ireland’s corporate tax rate, at just 12.5%, is among the lowest in the developed world. In contrast, the global average stands at around 23%, according to the Tax Foundation. This disparity has made Ireland an attractive destination for major U.S. multinationals like Apple, Alphabet (Google’s parent company), Meta (Facebook’s parent), Pfizer, and Intel. These corporations have established significant operations in Irish cities such as Dublin and Cork, where they declare a significant proportion of their global profits.
Corporation tax receipts accounted for over 25% of Ireland’s total government revenue in 2023, a staggering figure when compared to countries like the United Kingdom, where the equivalent proportion is less than 10%. The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council reported that just 10 large companies were responsible for 60% of Ireland’s corporate tax receipts in 2022, with three companies alone contributing a third of the total tax haul.
Though the fiscal watchdog did not name these companies, it is widely assumed that U.S. tech giants dominate the list. This concentration of tax receipts from a handful of multinationals leaves Ireland highly exposed to any potential changes in global tax policies, particularly those driven by the United States.
U.S. Inaction Undermines Global Tax Reform
The OECD’s 2021 tax agreement was signed by 139 countries, including all the world’s major economies. Its first component, the digital taxing principle, sought to empower countries to collect taxes based on where a company’s revenue is generated, rather than where it is headquartered. This reform would theoretically allow countries like France and Germany to collect taxes from tech giants like Meta and Alphabet, even if these companies declare minimal profits in those countries.
The second component of the agreement was a global minimum tax rate of 15%, designed to eliminate the incentive for corporations to shift profits to tax havens like Ireland. The OECD estimated that this measure would reduce the profits booked in low-tax jurisdictions by 80%, effectively curbing tax avoidance.
However, the reform has stalled, particularly due to inaction from the United States. As many of the world’s largest corporations are American, the U.S. government’s failure to implement the minimum tax has weakened the agreement’s efficacy. With a divided Congress and uncertain political will, the prospect of meaningful U.S. participation in the OECD deal appears slim. Without U.S. involvement, the global tax system as envisioned by the OECD remains largely unworkable.
Ireland’s Position Remains Secure
Even if the global minimum tax were fully implemented, its impact on Ireland might be minimal. At 12.5%, Ireland’s corporate tax rate is already close to the 15% threshold. Moreover, Ireland successfully lobbied to have the words “at least” removed from the agreement, ensuring that the global rate would not exceed 15%. This suggests that, even with a global minimum tax, Ireland’s low-tax regime would remain competitive.
The second pillar of the OECD reform, the digital taxing right, is also bogged down. The aim was to allow governments to tax companies without a local physical presence. However, disagreement over how to implement these rules has delayed progress. U.S. opposition remains a significant hurdle, as the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the United States could lose $57 billion in tax revenue over the next decade if the digital tax were implemented. With no resolution in sight, countries like France and Spain are likely to continue imposing their own national digital taxes, further complicating the situation.
This impasse benefits Ireland, as its share of global corporate tax receipts remains largely untouched.
EU Pressure Unlikely to Shift Ireland
While Ireland’s European neighbors could theoretically push for reforms that would erode the country’s tax advantages, significant changes are unlikely. The EU has previously floated the idea of bloc-wide digital taxes, but such proposals have gained little traction. With major EU economies like France facing fiscal pressures, there may be growing frustration with Ireland’s tax regime. However, achieving consensus on EU-wide tax measures is notoriously difficult, and Brussels has few tools at its disposal to force Ireland to change its policies.
A Financial Boon Amid Political Uncertainty
Ireland’s windfall could not come at a better time for the government of Prime Minister Simon Harris and Finance Minister Jack Chambers. With a general election required by March 2025, the country’s leaders have ample funds to address pressing domestic issues, such as the chronic housing shortage and the need for infrastructure improvements, including a long-awaited underground metro system in Dublin.
However, this financial largesse is likely to provoke frustration among Ireland’s hard-pressed neighbors. As the OECD reforms remain stalled, Ireland’s surplus will continue to grow, solidifying its position as a major beneficiary of the global corporate tax system. For now, Chambers and Harris can afford to focus on domestic priorities, secure in the knowledge that Ireland’s tax advantages are unlikely to disappear any time soon.
Related topics: